View source for Annex 24.1 Selected monitoring data, disaggregated for men and women

Most data are up to June 2019, based on the WMG tracker data base or report (WP9H) and/or taken from other (more recent) sources as mentioned. 
 '''Note:''' Available for download in [[:File:Annex 24.1 Selected monitoring data - sex disaggregated.pdf|PDF format]]
{| class="wikitable"
! rowspan="2" |Activity
! colspan="4" |Participants
! rowspan="2" |Targets  / Source and/or Remarks
|-
!Total
!Male
!Female
!% female
|-
! colspan="6" |Women’s involvement in WMOs and Participatory Water Management
|-
!WMG membership (511 WMGs)
|136,919
|77,748
|59,171
|43 %
|Target: 40% women
|-
!EC members (511 WMGs)
|6,132
|4088
|2044
|33 %
|Target: 30% women; all WMGs have at least 4 out of 12 women; these data on M/F are calculated, but in practice some WMGs have more than 4 women EC members (actual data not available)  
|-
!Key EC positions in WMGs (chair, secretary, treasurer)
|1,533
|1394
|139
|9 %
|Data from zonal offices (2018/19); women as vice chair and joint secretary excluded 
|-
!EC members of WMAs
|420
|280
|140
|33 %
|Target: 30% women; data calculated based on 4 women/EC which was achieved in all WMAs
|-
!Important EC positions in WMAs (chair/vice chair, secretary/joint secretary, treasurer)
|105
|75
|30
|29%
|Data from zonal offices; most women are vice chair or joint secretary (few in the 3 key positions of chair, secretary or treasurer)
|-
!WMG members involved in O&M activities
|25,520
|21,151
|4,369
|17 %
|
|-
!Savings from WMG members, average per member
|BDT 226
|BDT 223
|BDT 232
|
|Total savings = BDT 31 M; average savings by women slightly higher than by men
|-
!WMG members benefiting from investment of WMG credits in IGAs
|14, 205
|8,950
|5,255
|37 %
|Total is from WP9H; M/F ratio based on WP9G
|-
! colspan="6" |Women’s involvement in agricultural production
|-
!FFS participants (total of all FFS below)
|88,650
|33,513
|55,137
|  62 %   
|Total of below rows; no adjustment for multiple participation, apart from MFS
|-
!-homestead production FFS (1133 groups @ 25 part.)
|29,450
|3,594
|25,856
|88 %
|Poultry, vegetables, beef fattening and/or fish, cycle 1-15 (mid 2021)
|-
!-crop production FFS + homestead production (984 groups @ 25 hh = 50 part.)
|49,200
|24,600
|24,600
|50 %
|Source: outreach table agricultural production. Men did crop modules; women mostly the homestead / nutrition modules
|-
!-CAWM FFS (71 groups @ 50 hhs=100 participants)
|7,100
|3,550
|3,550
|50 %
|Source: outreach table agricultural production. Each FFS took 2 seasons/crops; men in crop modules; women usually homestead / nutrition
|-
!-market-oriented FFS (232 MFS for 116 groups, each group in 2 FFS cycles)
|5,800 x 0.5 = 2,900
|3,538 x 0.5 = 1,769
|2,262 x 0.5 = 1,131
|39 %
|Source: outreach table agricultural production; % women from WPH9; each group structurally in 2 MFS, hence adjustment with 50% 
|-
!Trained Resource Farmers 
|679
|195
|484
|71 %
|Not all trained RFs are active anymore
|-
!Farmer Trainers (FTs) by TA
|95
|61
|34
|36%
|Info from Section E
|-
!Farmer Trainers (FTs) by DAE
|120
|60
|60
|50%
|Info Roksana end 2019
|-
!Community Poultry Workers
|60
|0
|60
|100%
|
|-
!Community Livestock Workers
|40
|38
|2
|5%
|The 2 women are hardly active as CWLs anymore
|-
!Total participants in all horizontal learning, incl:
|243,900
|105,253
|138,647
|57 %
|Source: WP9H
|-
!-farmers’ field days TA
|160,578
|64,247
|96,331
|60 %
|
|-
!-farmers field days DAE
|61,911
|30,249
|31,662
|51 %
|
|-
!-exchange of FFS/MFS learning
|13,832
|6,141
|7,691
|56 %
|
|-
!Total plot owners trials on modern agricultural technologies, incl:
|5,731
|1,769
|3,962
|69 %
|Source: WP9H
|-
!-Vegetables
|1,548
|298
|1,250
|81 %
|
|-
!-Farm Yard Manure (FYM)
|759
|98
|660
|87 %
|
|-
!-Poultry housing
|727
|16
|711
|98 %
|
|-
!-T-Aman
|526
|506
|20
|4 %
|
|-
!-Mung bean
|424
|224
|200
|47 %
|
|-
!-Mustard
|400
|100
|300
|75 %
|
|-
!Total WMG members adopting modern agricultural technologies

Most common:
|358,547
|201,215
|157,432
|44 %
|Farmers adopting more than one technology have been double counted
|-
!-HYV rice
|45,376
|37,426
|7,950
|18 %
|
|-
!-vaccination 
|41,238
|15,241
|25,997
|63 %
|
|-
!-IPM (integrated pest management)
|37,226
|28,166
|9,060
|24 %
|
|-
!-hajol (hazal)
|35,637
|2,735
|32,902
|92 %
|
|-
!-hybrid vegetable seed
|31,366
|16,859
|14,507
|46 %
|
|-
!-line sowing
|31,199
|26,932
|4,267
|14 %
|
|-
! colspan="6" |Women’s involvement in other BGP activities, such as training and specific gender activities
|-
!Members of Labour Contracting Societies (LCS) groups 
|31,437
|20,671
|10,766
|34%
|Source: WP9H; Target: 30% women (PWMR2014); 40% (BGP) 
|-
!Total WMG members who received training / orientation 

-of which (examples):
|28,798
|18,292
|10,506
|36 %
|Source: WP9H; One trainee is counted more than once when participating in more than one training.
|-
!-LCS training
|12,243
|7,393
|4,850
|40 %
|Source: WP9H (excluding on-the-job training)
|-
!-Management of agricultural machinery
|4,683
|3,066
|1,617
|35 %
|Source: WP9H
|-
!-Account keeping and audit system
|1,876
|1,412
|464
|25 %
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
!-Gender and Leadership Development (old approach)
|1,621
|922
|699
|43 %
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
! colspan="6" |Specific gender activities:
|-
!Gender and Leadership Development (new approach of 5 sessions / group)
|10,919
|2,494 
|7,262 
|72 %
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
!Gender courtyard sessions (1 session/group)
|41,425
|13,029
|28,396
|69%
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
!Market Linkages and Women’s Empowerment training (2 days)
|205
|33
|172
|84%
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
!Joint UP-BGP workshops on women’s empowerment (1 day)
|120
|0
|120
|100 %
|Data from Chapter 31 Capacity Building
|-
! colspan="6" |Disaggregated data about Blue Gold staff
|-
!BGP TA field staff (CDFs)
|110
|74
|36
|33%
|Data of 2019 -Target: 50% for COs; 30% as FFS facilitators 
|-
!BGP TA professionals in zonal offices, excluding CDFs and admin/support staff
|25
|25
|0
|0 %
|Per March 2019 – NB: more female staff in zonal offices in earlier years of BGP
|-
!BGP zonal and field staff participants in 2017 gender training 
|111
|84
|27
|24%
|Almost all zonal/field staff participated; in 2017 there were less CDFs than in 2019
|-
!BGP TA professional / technical staff – Dhaka, excl admin/support staff
|20
|14
|6
|30 %
|Per March 2019
|}